Amendment 60 to Article II - Proposed by Scott Steward

Bold underlining indicate insertion ; [brackets indicate deletion.]

44 Section C-2.3. Inspirations.
45 As Unitarian Universalists, we [use, and] are inspired by[, sacred and secular understandings] the world’s religions, and wisdom traditions, by indigenous knowledge, by humanist teachings, by science and other secular sources of knowledge and meaning, by the arts, which open our hearts to life’s joys and sorrows, and by the direct experience of wonder and mystery which expands our minds and spirit
46 [that help us to live into our values]. We respect the histories, contexts and cultures in which
47 they were created and are currently practiced. These sources ground us and sustain us in
48 ordinary, difficult, and joyous times. Grateful for the religious ancestries we inherit and the
49 diversity which enriches our faith, we are called to ever deepen and expand our wisdom.

2 Likes

The following has similarities to proposed Amendment #53.

As Unitarian Universalists, we [use, and] are inspired by, [sacred and secular understandings that help us to live into our values.] the world’s religions, and wisdom traditions, by indigenous knowledge, by humanist teachings, by science and other secular sources of knowledge and meaning, by the arts, which open our hearts to life’s joys and sorrows, and by the direct experience of wonder and mystery which expands our minds and spirit . We respect the histories, contexts and cultures in which they were created and are currently practiced. These sources ground us and sustain us in ordinary, difficult, and joyous times. Grateful for the religious ancestries we inherit and the diversity which enriches our faith, we are called to ever deepen and expand our wisdom.

Amendment without editorial marks:

As Unitarian Universalists, we are inspired by the world’s religions, and wisdom traditions, by indigenous knowledge, by humanist teachings, by science and other secular sources of knowledge and meaning, by the arts, which open our hearts to life’s joys and sorrows, and by the direct experience of wonder and mystery which expands our minds and spirit. We respect the histories, contexts and cultures in which they were created and are currently practiced. These sources ground us and sustain us in ordinary, difficult, and joyous times. Grateful for the religious ancestries we inherit and the diversity which enriches our faith, we are called to ever deepen and expand our wisdom.

General Reasons for Amendment:

After consideration of the many submissions that asked for more reference to sources, I see the #85amendment development as achieving the balance of naming sources without losing the continuity of Inspirations as part of the overall revised six values and Article II tapestry.

My only change to what Becca finally submitted was to include humanist teachings and not the phrase " that challenge us to create a better world for all." I would keep that phrase if the description of named inspirations was not already long and if it was clear that humanist teachings are not the only source that challenges us to create a better world.

Other than that change this submission is hers. I am reminded that submissions should be distinctly different, but I am adding mine to emphasize the need to name the inspiration and not leave it just to the binary of what is sacred and what is secular. It is my hope that by providing the backgound and reasoning for this amendment that my fellow delegates would consider voting for it.

In the final review, I agree with #85’s author, that the focus of an amendment should be on the inclusion of named inspirations (sentence 1 and 2). I came to the conclusion, as much as I worked at it, the Study Commissions text contained the tone and completeness of the relationship I have to inspiration as a member of a UUA member association. The last three sentences remain unchanged.

Specific Reasons for Amendment:

strike “use, and”: the list of inspirations that follow “we are inspired” are not always in use or ours to use. It is enough to state we are inspired. “use, and” could be left in as well but being frugal with the number of words is a further reason to let of “use, and”.

strike: ", sacred and secular understandings… . Secular is kept and sacred is described in the suggested amendment named inspirations that follow: “the world’s religions, and wisdom traditions, by indigenous knowledge, by humanist teachings, by science and other secular sources of knowledge and meaning, by the arts, which open our hearts to life’s joys and sorrows, and by the direct experience of wonder and mystery” I appreciate the succinct and elegant “sacred and secular” as it avoids the naming of inspirations that might leave one excluded, but lets try this amendment on for size. I think it does the work of naming inspirations comprehensively, evenly, and without losing the continuity of the original Inspiration text.

strike: “…that help us to live into our values.” Inspirations can serve many purposes including helping UUs live their values. Help is described in a sentence that follows - retained from the SC revision “These sources ground us and sustain us in ordinary, difficult, and joyous times.” Help described, the phrase “that help…” may not be needed. Further the balance of Article II contains the statement “live our values.”

Process used to reach recommending this amendment:

For the Study Commission revised Article II inspirations. I reviewed 13 amendment requests for keeping most or all of the sources (most were short requests to restore the 6 sources). I reviewed about as many for changing the draft of Inspirations offered by the Study Commission, but not for the return of a statement for each source.

What I saw most common was the request to include “direct experience” “mystery and wonder” I appreciate #364 Karen Zindell’s brevity and content and particularly like the phrase “prophetic words and deeds”, though I defer to the SC structure.
#277 Meta Thayer came up with a flowing way to include “earth-centered traditions and humanist teachings”

I followed #85 Becca Boerger most closely as her exploration and coalition was very comprehensive and closest overall what I was looking for in Inspirations-
The amendment I submitted makes a minor change to Becca’s amendment. I proposed this on the same thread #85 so that others can follow the conversations leading up to the amendment.

I have been in communication with the other 4 delegates from UU Church of Davis and with our Reverend. Our congregation does not have a tradition of informing our delegates as to how to vote at GA. Our congregation members have not organized to create amendments to Article II and have left it up to our delegates. Our 5 delegates have only sought to create 2 amendments , one for Purposes and one for Inspirations.

Consideration of this amendment comes after thorough review of the potential amendment submissions, extensive, if condensed, review of the Study Commissions work and dialogue with my fellow delegates who have been at this longer than I have.

Scott,

I think I get your reasoning for removing “use” and “live into our lives.” I think it is the following. Let me know if I have goofed.

You don’t want to include “and use”, because we do not always use these inspirations. Sometimes we do and sometimes we don’t. Because we don’t use them all the time, you feel we should not say that we use them.

You don’t want to include “that help us to live into our values”, because living into our values is only one use that we make of inspirations. There are other uses. Because you feel that “that help us to live into our values” kind of implies “that ONLY help us to live into our values”, you feel we should take it out.

I THINK I understand what you’re saying. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

I think both of those lines of thought are not sensible. When I say, “I use a hammer”, I don’t mean that all I do all day is hold a hammer and hit things. Saying, “I use X” is not a claim that I use X all the time.

Saying that I use a hammer doesn’t mean that I only use a hammer. Maybe a better example: I really do use a Japanese-style saw (it’s shaped like a machete and has a machete-like handle). When I tell you I use a Japanese-style saw, I’m not saying I don’t use a hammer. I’m not even saying I don’t use an American-style saw. I’m highlighting what has a chance of being distinctive about my tool set.

Why does this matter to me? I worry that these kind-of-dubious rationales are being used to remove commitments to action. Removing “use” is removing action. Removing reference to “live into our values” is removing a call to align the actions of your life with your values.

I do not want to remove commitments to action.

I like the word “inspire”. I like that many sources are included while keeping the statement concise.

good to hear Nick - I did consider meaning and what words were needed and not needed to convey that meaning. The words could be placed back should this amendment rise to the attention of the Mini Assembly.

The main point of amendment 60 is the remainder of sentence 45 that begins with "the worlds religions.

1 Like

If the amendments you favored weren’t prioritized or presented: This forum is closing for comment tomorrow, but our lay-led public Facebook group, Blue Boat Passengers, will remain open for another few weeks for commenting (and still be viewable after that).

If you want to find people to coordinate with for the 15-congregation amendment process, you may use the group to do so while it remains open. There’s now a specific post for this in the group (“A post for those wishing to do the 15-congregation amendment process to coordinate”). Please read both the rules and the pinned post about the pending suspension of the group before posting or commenting there.