Thank you so much for doing all this work, emotionally and research/writing wise . I wish we could share your thorough answer with more people because even many not-transphobic people would still learn from this
Fair point. IDK who is our official representative for UUA communicationsāanything from the association apparently goes into a black hole at Central Unitarian Church (my CUC; it always takes a moment when I see the acronym of the Canadian group). It has taken me years to find my way into places where I can find news.
Feel free to share any of these! I donāt mind and I want more knowledge spread!
Thank you so much for all this work and information. This is an amazing set of resources.
Most of us who donāt have direct interactions with the affected youth must rely on the best science. Right now the best science is coming out of Europe. The science promoted by WPATH has become highly suspect in the world medical community.
Thank you so much continuing to share reliable globally recognized science. I will continue to prioritize the lives of people including children who are transgender, nonbinary and intersex are in danger because of transphobia.
Iām not sure what to say or do about folks who continue wrap themselves in misinformation and ignorance (when you have shared so much science and evidence) except continue to center transgender, nonbinary and intersex voices in this space yours among them.
I hope wish to send energetic loving and protective vibes to transgender, nonbinary and intersex UUs in this discussion and in the world, and those like myself who want you all and transgender, nonbinary and intersex children to live and thrive.
Even if everything youāve said were correct, it does not go anywhere, Itās fear-mongering. People who donāt have direct interactions with trans youth should rely on those youth, their parents and their medical caregivers to make decisions knowing all of the aspects of the situation. I think as UUs we are supportive of self-determination.
This is particularly true given that (a) a small proportion of trans youth use puberty blockers and HRT, and (b) the science you cite says that the long term effect on youth is unknown. Not negative, just unknown. I think itās reasonable to assume that the children receiving medical treatment are the ones in the most distress and the ones whose lives are being saved by treatment. Many others are socially transitioning. And the greatest danger to all trans people, youth or adult, medically transitioning or socially transitioning, is from anti-trans-ness and the hate crimes that mindset motivates.
āThe best scienceā about trans health is emphatically not ācoming out of Europeā if what you are referring to is the Cass review. Again, it has been thoroughly debunked by many health care professionals, bioethicists, trans activists, and others, and is specifically an anti-trans, pro-conversion-therapy political project rather than a genuine good faith attempt to create beneficial standards of care for trans youth.
This setting is not conducive to debunking it again, but thankfully, Dr Ruth Pearce has compiled (and frequently updates) a list of statements critical of the Cass Review from professional organizations, academics, health care providers, trans activists, human rights groups and others: Whatās wrong with the Cass Review? A round-up of commentary and evidence ā Dr Ruth Pearce
Hi Dick, Iād love to point you to the resources and short articles I have written and researched heavily, that I responded to you directly about. Your reply makes me wonder if you read the link debunking the Cass Report that I included, because that link explains it in great detail. Reading reputable summaries of a great amount of research is designed to help bring us closer to our responsible search for truth and meaning.
The first post I tagged you in has the information about the Cass Report, and how many medical associations support trans, non-binary, and gender diverse people and our healthcare. Each blue link directly takes you to the organizationās letter of support. Here is the direct link so you donāt have to scroll up. [AMENDED] UUA Business Resolution: Embracing Transgender, Nonbinary and Intersex People is a Fundamental Expression of UU Religious Values - #26 by SashaBriarGast
In addition, the WPATH guidelines have an extensive references section and has been heavily edited by researchers and doctors in the actual field that they study. The WPATH book available online is a metanalysis of all available research, including junk studies.
These are the authors of WPATH version 8, NOT including the research cited.
Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender
and Gender Diverse People, Version 8
E. Coleman, A. E. Radix, W. P. Bouman, G. R. Brown, A. L. C. de Vries, M. B.
Deutsch, R. Ettner, L. Fraser, M. Goodman, J. Green, A. B. Hancock, T. W.
Johnson, D. H. Karasic, G. A. Knudson, S. F. Leibowitz, H. F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg,
S. J. Monstrey, J. Motmans, L. Nahata, T. O. Nieder, S. L. Reisner, C. Richards,
L. S. Schechter, V. Tangpricha, A. C. Tishelman, M. A. A. Van Trotsenburg, S.
Winter, K. Ducheny, N. J. Adams, T. M. AdriƔn, L. R. Allen, D. Azul, H. Bagga,
K. BaÅar, D. S. Bathory, J. J. Belinky, D. R. Berg, J. U. Berli, R. O. BluebondLangner, M.-B. Bouman, M. L. Bowers, P. J. Brassard, J. Byrne, L. CapitĆ”n, C.
J. Cargill, J. M. Carswell, S. C. Chang, G. Chelvakumar, T. Corneil, K. B. Dalke,
G. De Cuypere, E. de Vries, M. Den Heijer, A. H. Devor, C. Dhejne, A. DāMarco,
E. K. Edmiston, L. Edwards-Leeper, R. Ehrbar, D. Ehrensaft, J. Eisfeld, E. Elaut,
L. Erickson-Schroth, J. L. Feldman, A. D. Fisher, M. M. Garcia, L. Gijs, S. E.
Green, B. P. Hall, T. L. D. Hardy, M. S. Irwig, L. A. Jacobs, A. C. Janssen, K.
Johnson, D. T. Klink, B. P. C. Kreukels, L. E. Kuper, E. J. Kvach, M. A. Malouf, R.
Massey, T. Mazur, C. McLachlan, S. D. Morrison, S. W. Mosser, P. M. Neira, U.
Nygren, J. M. Oates, J. Obedin-Maliver, G. Pagkalos, J. Patton, N. Phanuphak,
K. Rachlin, T. Reed, G. N. Rider, J. Ristori, S. Robbins-Cherry, S. A. Roberts, K.
A. Rodriguez-Wallberg, S. M. Rosenthal, K. Sabir, J. D. Safer, A. I. Scheim, L. J.
Seal, T. J. Sehoole, K. Spencer, C. St. Amand, T. D. Steensma, J. F. Strang, G. B.
Taylor, K. Tilleman, G. G. TāSjoen, L. N. Vala, N. M. Van Mello, J. F. Veale, J. A.
Vencill, B. Vincent, L. M. Wesp, M. A. West & J. Arcelus
And again, Iām a biologist/ecologist who happens to be trans. I read scientific literature as part of my career, and I have a MS degree (and half of a PhD) so I have had extensive training in grad school about how to read and understand science across many fields. Being trans does not bias me towards science that supports my claims, but rather, I know how to look for good methodology vs. poor methodology or biased articles written by researchers with conflicts of interest or in non-reputable journals.
As a 77 non-binary, lesbian UU I cherish the thoughts that have gone into this discussion. Iām attending GA and intend to attend the discussion on this Business Resolution later this week. In the interim Iām going to read the resolution with all youāve said in mind and hope I come out the other side with a bettere understanding of just what this change will mean. Thanks all for your research and diligenceā¦
I appreciate your honesty that you donāt feel it important to consider the actual affected communities when you think you know better, and that you can define ābest scienceā to mean studies that agree with your already predetermined beliefs instead of the thousand of links debunking it. That seems to be a theme over the years.
I am curious to know your qualifications to determine what is the best science, and what verifiable facts you have rather than using innuendo like āhighly suspect in the world medical communityā while ignoring allllll the professional organizations who support health care for trans kids.
Letās go with proof over rhetoric. Whatās the scientific consensus? (Hint: Its not a single widely debunked study out of Europe.)
Many consider the Cass Report and related European studies to have discredited the practices of WPATH and the āscienceā it promotes. The WPATH files (released by a whistleblower) reinforce this assessment. Many of us consider this a scandal that is fueling the cultural wars and may very well help re-elect Trump.
I am a Ph.D. (applied math) and science generalist, rather than specialist in anyone field. Iām also very critical of mainstream economics and neoliberal globalization, in addition to scandals in medical science.
Ah yes. The infamous āmanyā and āmany of us.ā Well reasoned!
So, you donāt have a scientific background in this field. How are you able to pick and choose what scientific studies qualify as ābest scienceā? There sure are a whole of links in this thread you havenāt clicked on that donāt support what youāre saying. Bet theyāre still blue on your end. And I thought we were supposed to use reason.
And that youāre calling the kids in my youth group getting the health care they need a āscandal.ā I mean, wowza, you really arenāt hiding are ya. Thank you for elaborating on these points, so folks here can see where opposition to this business resolution is really rooted in.
UU World Article Spring 2024
Pink Haven Coalition Helps Transgender People Relocate and Access Gender-Affirming Care by Fin Leary
In some states it is already a crime to provide gender-affirming care to minors and young adults, and, as of this writing, organizers are bracing for an even more brutal 2024 legislative session, compounding what they describe as the nightmarish daily reality for trans people in the United States.
Because of these laws, trans people in the United States could meet the definition of Internally Displaced People, or IDPs, by the United Nations. Hundreds of thousands of trans people and their families have already fled their homes to safer states with more than a million considering doing so, according to a recent Data for Progress survey.
Keep reading at UU World ā
Hey Dick, can I ask why you have not responded to any of the comments I have left you (and directly replied to you on) for the last 14 days of this discussion? Is there a reason that you are ignoring what Iāve written as a biologist AND as someone in the affected community? You keep speaking of the Cass report and yet information has already been provided to you about how the report is incredibly biased, dangerous, and based on junk science. I have presented 5 of my own short metanalysis articles that Iāve researched from numerous published journal papers, medical whitepapers, and case studies about trans youth healthcare and what that actually looks like in practice.
You say you are a science generalist, and yet you have not responded to me, an actual biologist. It is critically important to speak from a learned space if you want to discuss transgender healthcare while also understanding the context that we live in that make access to live saving care difficult. Trans youth healthcare is safe. Trans youth health care dramatically reduces suicide rates. Trans youth healthcare saves lives.
What is your agenda, then?
Here are the direct links to all of the articles I wrote, so you donāt have to use the scroll button.
Here is one summary of European research:
āSince 2019, major reviews of the benefits and harms of gender medicalization for children have been conducted in Finland, Sweden, Germany, Denmark, Norway, and the U.K. Every one of these has determined that the evidence relied upon for pediatric āgender affirmation medicineā is of very low quality. They state that it is inappropriate to claim that transition improves mental health and reduces suicides.ā
Thus, I am very skeptical of the research cited by WPATH. This is apparently due to its ideological agenda, as demonstrated by the WPATH files, released by a whistleblower.
Cite your sources please. I donāt see any science there.
I will have to vote against this as worded, even though I want to support it and LGBTQ people. It conflates gender and sex which seems to be a recurring challenge from the very group who should be best able to note the difference. Gender is not assigned at birth, sex is.