This sentence makes it sound as if UUs have no theology. It over-emphasizes a lack of creed in a section intended to discuss what we hold in common.
This is not an important theological discussion for contemporary Unitarian Universalism as a whole, and should not be centered. The learning we take from our Unitarian ancestors is to engage directly with our religious sources, engaging with them as human beings with the full spectrum of human understandings, rather than accepting received wisdom and interpretation without questioning it.
strike man, replace with humanity. This is unnecessarily gendered language.
This proposal lacks reference to any non-Western religious or philosophical traditions or to the direct experience of mystery and wonder, and, in my view, is incomplete.