Active AIW - Defending LGBTIQ Freedom Amid Funding Crisis: A Call for Global Solidarity

Update 6/17: This AIW was selected to be added to the final agenda. See full AIW ballot results.

Updated 6/9 to incorporate revisions from feedback session

Proposer: Keola Whittaker, Delegate for First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles


Defending LGBTIQ Freedom Amid Funding Crisis: A Call for Global Solidarity

Our Unitarian Universalist principles affirm the dignity of every person, justice and compassion in human relations, and the goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all. Our UU faith calls us to recognize that all bodies are sacred, and that each person is endowed with the divine gifts of agency, conscience, and self-determination, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation.

As Unitarian Universalists, we understand that liberation theology requires us to center the most marginalized communities and stand against systems of oppression that target our LGBTIQ siblings both at home and across the globe. We recognize that homophobia, transphobia, and discrimination know no borders and true global justice requires that we acknowledge the interconnected nature of human rights struggles and accept our moral responsibility to act from a place of radical solidarity. Our local and global struggles are inextricably linked, requiring our response to be equally interconnected.

The attacks on LGBTIQ communities represent a coordinated global movement of oppression that demands our unified resistance. Anti-LGBTIQ legislation, rhetoric, and violence in one country emboldens similar actions elsewhere, creating a dangerous cycle that threatens progress everywhere. When we defend LGBTIQ rights globally, we strengthen our own local movements; when we advocate locally, we contribute to global liberation.

According to Outright International [1], global funding for LGBTIQ human rights has suffered an abrupt termination of over $100 million due to funding cuts from the U.S. and the Netherlands and pullbacks from corporations and other private donors, representing 30-40% of all global LGBTIQ funding. Approximately 90% of USAID programs supporting LGBTIQ communities globally have been terminated, devastating grassroots movements worldwide.

This funding crisis has forced the closure of critical programs supporting democratic participation, economic livelihoods for trans communities, emergency shelters, legal reform, and health services including HIV prevention and treatment. Without urgent intervention, 20-25% of grassroots LGBTIQ organizations in 50 countries may be forced to shut down entirely, leaving vulnerable populations without vital support and protection.

Simultaneously, we face devastating cuts to domestic LGBTIQ support services. It has been reported that the federal government proposes eliminating all funding for the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline’s LGBTQ+ Youth Specialized Services, effective October 1, 2025. This $50 million cut would devastate services that provided over 1.2 million crisis contacts since 2022. The Trevor Project [2], which handles nearly 50% of these specialized services’ contact volume and served over 231,000 crisis contacts in 2024 alone, is undergoing layoffs and restructuring due to decreased individual donations and an increasingly hostile political climate targeting LGBTIQ communities.

The human cost of these cuts is already evident in places like:

  • Uganda, where LGBTIQ people cannot safely seek care in government hospitals due to the draconian 2023 Anti-Homosexuality Act;
  • Myanmar, where legal aid for arbitrarily arrested LGBTIQ individuals has been suspended;
  • Malawi, where safe houses for homeless lesbian, bisexual, trans, and intersex women facing violence have been closed;
  • Ukraine, where programs supporting displaced LGBTIQ people during wartime have shut down; and
  • Communities across the United States, where LGBTIQ youth face unprecedented levels of legislative attacks, book bans, and restrictions on healthcare access, while crisis intervention services are being systematically defunded.

Resolved: We, the delegates of the 2025 UUA General Assembly, call on Unitarian Universalist congregations to:

  1. Commit
  • Educate congregations about both the global LGBTIQ funding crisis and local threats to LGBTIQ communities through worship services, adult education programs, and congregational forums.
  • Examine our congregations’ connections to international human rights and our capacity to contribute resources to this urgent cause.
  • Integrate local and global LGBTIQ justice into our congregational mission and social justice priorities as interconnected struggles requiring unified action.
  1. Organize
  • Form LGBTIQ global solidarity groups within congregations using educational resources from organizations like Outright International and the Unitarian Universalist Service Committee.
  • Build meaningful partnerships between congregations and international LGBTIQ organizations, particularly those working in countries with hostile environments for LGBTIQ people.
  • Connect UU congregations with other faith communities to amplify advocacy efforts and resource mobilization.
  1. Advocate
  • Pass congregational resolutions urging the U.S. government to restore and increase funding for both international LGBTIQ human rights work and domestic crisis intervention services.
  • Organize congregational letter-writing campaigns to elected officials to express concern about the devastating impact of funding cuts on vulnerable LGBTIQ populations both globally and in our own communities.
  • Write op-eds, letters to editors, and social media content to raise awareness about the interconnected nature of local and global LGBTIQ oppression.
  • Coordinate congregational participation in solidarity events that center the voices and needs of international LGBTIQ communities.
  1. Witness
  • Speak publicly as people of faith whose UU theology compels us to work for local and global LGBTIQ rights as one unified struggle.
  • Participate in solidarity events that center the voices and needs of both local and international LGBTIQ communities.
  • Demonstrate faith-based support for LGBTIQ rights in our neighborhood and around the world.
  1. Fundraise for international LGBTIQ funding intermediaries like Outright International, as well as domestic crisis intervention organizations like The Trevor Project that serve LGBTIQ youth facing suicide risk, recognizing that our local and global movements strengthen each other through mutual support.

  2. Engage in Learning

  • Host educational forums on the global state of LGBTIQ rights and the impacts of funding cuts on both international and domestic communities.

  • Invite representatives from international LGBTIQ organizations to speak at congregations virtually or in person.

  • Develop youth and adult religious education curricula on local and global LGBTIQ justice that emphasizes the interconnectedness.

  • Share stories of resilience and resistance from LGBTIQ communities facing repression both in our communities and around the world.

In recognition that homophobia and transphobia are global forces that threaten LGBTIQ communities everywhere, from our own neighborhoods to the most distant corners of the world, and that the survival of both local and global LGBTIQ movements depends on our understanding that these struggles are one struggle, we commit to answering this call to courage with our resources, our advocacy, and our faithful solidarity that knows no borders.


Feedback session recording:


  1. Outright International has 35 years of experience working with local activists in over 100 countries and holds consultative status at the United Nations. The organization strengthens LGBTIQ movements globally through grantmaking and technical support, as well as supporting advocacy programs that amplify activist voices to advance equality worldwide. (Defunding Freedom – Impacts of U.S. Foreign Aid Cuts on LGBTIQ People Worldwide | Outright International) ↩︎

  2. The Trevor Project is the world’s largest suicide prevention and crisis intervention organization for LGBTQ young people, serving over 231,000 crisis contacts in 2024 alone. (https://www.thetrevorproject.org/blog/what-to-know-about-988-funding) ↩︎

3 Likes

This AIW has already been modified to incorporate some suggestions, but may be amended again after tonight’s session. If you would like to read the more up-to-date version, it is here: Defending Funding Global LGBTIQ Freedom Amid Funding Crisis: A Call for Immediate Action and Solidarity - Google Docs

This is super important to all of us. We have a moral and character, face in the mirror, to protect our siblings, all in our community

Please consider to change the “Other” to “Ally”. It is important to take “Not Othering” seriously in our words. The word “other” distracts, as we are focussed on inclusion off all members Human RIghts, and the importance of Ally building in coalition with Community.

Our Words Matter.

I love that this AIW is both outward facing (not just solely US-based) and includes our 2SLGBTQIA+ communities and connects us all to this immediate crisis. I really appreciated the very well done presentation in the AIW feedback session. Thank you!

2 Likes

The word ally seems to be limiting; if we are going to change other—which I don’t find used in a problematic way here—then I would suggest either dropping the word or using something that doesn’t suggest preaching only to the choir.

1 Like

If building coalition across the nation with people of common values is “preaching to the choir”, I honor this wish for the idea to be heard. I am focused on connecting people together in coalition with common values. One of the methods is to build quickly with common values. Also one of the methods is to not spend energy and resources on people who are not ready to hear the message. I hear the idea of “Ally” is " limiting "- I counter with - the word Ally is focusing: focused on building coalition. I am respecting the fact of the opinion stated regarding “othering”. I acknowledge this opinion was dialogued already on multiple AIWs. I’m glad that we are considering doing the work of “Not Othering”.

Hmm, I don’t know if we can succeed without those who are not currently allies. Yes, it does make sense to start coalition-building with allied groups and those who are already working on particular issues, but to me that is only a starting point, and the goal must be to bring those unaware into awareness, those opposed to see flaws in their opposition, etc.—basically to move everyone a step closer, regardless of starting point.
By saying “allies”, aren’t you in some sense excluding/“othering” nonallies? Sincere question.

1 Like

Making Invitations to work together is inclusive.
Focusing on the subject of concern, will attract the people interested in the work.
Regarding, suggesting “ally” might also be othering, each and all has the option to assign meaning to any word and that is the part of getting to know each other.

I have met cool individuals who start off by saying Hi Friend and end a conversation saying take Care Friend, to complete strangers. Another cool friend says “You are safe with me.”

The cool folks assume everyone is an Ally. If you saw Bryan Stevenson’s talk at a prior GA, he made an Ally of a person that strip searched him by holding in faith a commitment to build an ally relationship in the face of being “othered” by a security guard. To care & concern each and all we can start in friendship, assume allyship and in the face of being othered, hold the hope of Allyship.

As the relation develops, a person will self select Allyship or not. This relations building is a natural process of Allying (people self selecting allyship). The Focus is to be in an Ally relationship and trust that process. in contrast the word “Other and Othering” implies exclusion out of the gate. If we are sensitive to each other, and listening, lets focus on friendly relations to the point of using other sparingly (or never) to not distract us from our focus. Our Words Matter. Consider the people who are escaping authoritarianism and fascism are looking for allies to help them escape, and not make them wrong (no othering). Another point, it is important to have boundaries with our time resource. Boundaries are not “othering”. Self Care is not “othering”. Boundaries are necessary for selfcare and focus. Many people I know have struggles around boundaries. We are all in this together.

1 Like

Thanks; helpful food for thought here.

The recording of the feedback session is available:

1 Like

To the writers of this proposal, I would be curious to know why you chose the LGBTIQ acronym in place of using others like LGBTQIA+, etc. Is it primarily those 6 identities being targeted right now by legislation? (I hope this doesn’t come off as a loaded question; it is not intended as such.)

3 Likes

I oppose the AIW on support for global LGBTQIA programming impacted by the federal abdication of its responsibility. I don’t oppose individuals or congregations from pursuing this valuable work, and I will surely be among that company. I oppose the UUA placing that work in a position of priority above multiple other global programs that have been dismantled such as food and clean water programs as an urgent prime example. I believe the regime would love UUs to divide ourselves in arguing about what to support and to bankrupt ourselves trying to finance many billions of dollars of abdicated federal responsibilities. I believe that was a large part of the regime’s strategy of dismantling AID and I believe that approving this AIW is obeying in advance. Unfortunately, I fear that the headline coming out of GA would be “Unitarian Universalists support funding LGBTQIA programs rather than global food and clean water funding”. I believe our impact lies in robust resistance to dismantling AID and other aid programs implicit within the anti-authoritarian AIW.

I disagree that focusing on LGBTQIA issues and funding is any way whatsoever obeying in advance with an administration and a movement that seeks to eradicate LGBTQIA communities and individuals. It is the opposite of that. It is speaking and acting on our values despite what people of hate would like us to do out of fear of their retribution.

Many things are important at once, including the other kinds of aid that you mentioned. The very human lives of LGBTQIA people are not a distraction from those things. They are integral parts of the interdependent web of which we are part. Now is not the time to abandon them.

1 Like

As a queer and trans Unitarian Universalist, I’m voting no on this AIW — not because I oppose global LGBTIQ solidarity, but because I believe this resolution, as written, could unintentionally cause real harm.

I’m especially concerned by the mention of Uganda, where Western involvement in LGBTIQ advocacy has historically triggered severe backlash, including intensified criminalization and violence. When Western institutions speak loudly in defense of queer rights abroad without careful coordination or local leadership, those efforts can be used by governments to justify repression by painting queerness as a foreign threat.

This AIW gestures toward global partnership, but it doesn’t show enough awareness of how Western frameworks of identity and activism can land differently—and sometimes dangerously—in other cultural and political contexts. I fear that many U.S. congregations don’t yet have the relationships or the contextual understanding needed to implement this work in a safe and respectful way.

Solidarity must begin with listening, accountability, and a deep commitment to supporting efforts already underway in local communities. I hope we can return to this issue with more input from Global South partners and a more grounded, decolonial approach.

I’m always open to continuing this conversation and would welcome dialogue with anyone sitting with these same tensions.

1 Like

The regime would be delighted to have us agree with them that these needs should be financed by individuals rather than by the federal government. Approving this action would implicitly do that imo. Thus, obeying in advance.

If this gets onto the agenda—and I suspect that all 3 will—please bring this up during the discussion (I’m not sure if it is tomorrow or Saturday). I’d like to know what the proposers have to say about these issues.

1 Like

Sorry if already addressed. I’m ace and have noticed outside and now this within UU spaces a drop-off or rollback of our alphabet umbrella. LGBTQIA+. Instead of this, the proposed AIW has no “+” sign and no “A”. Was this omitted with reason you can share? Asking because it’s so new, like just the past few weeks, I’m seeing this LGBTQI without the A+.

3 Likes

I’ve posted before, but posting again after the General Session today.

I’m a queer/trans person who has a background studying global gender expressions, particularly in Africa. The language of this AIW set off alarm bells for me. It speaks of a global LGBT community - but the concept of LGBT is a Western invention that is often imposed on communities in the global south, who have their own indigenous conceptions of gender and sexuality.

This isn’t just an ideological concern. Western governments and advocacy groups acting without sensitivity to local contexts have directly led to government crackdowns in places like Uganda (which is mentioned by name in the AIW). The oppressive bans on homosexuality, including the recent one in 2023, were passed in reaction to international advocacy groups bringing what was framed as a “colonial import” - queerness - to Uganda. What we see as progress (“coming out,” gay marriage, etc.) is often harmful in non-western contexts. I use Uganda as an example, but this is a global trend.

The AIW is intended as a call for global solidarity, but that solidarity is impossible without a predisposition to be sensitive to local contexts. This sensitivity is a life-or-death matter, as the wrong kind of advocacy can make conditions significantly worse, not better, for people on the ground. I think the lack of any mention of local sexualities or genders will lead individual congregations to adopt the idea of a roughly homogenous LGBT international community that has caused harm in the past.

I suspect the AIW will pass, but I hope that we understand that this is a deeply complex issue, and do what we can to tread lightly.

3 Likes

As one of the volunteers on the Chat Mod team who are tasked with helping to get folx into the ques for speaking during the general sessions, I was frustrated along with you and many others that you didn’t get to speak. Thank you for leaving your comments here as I really wanted to hear what concerns might exist for this AIW.

1 Like

I remember your posting this earlier and wishing that it would be brought up during the discussion on the floor. It seems that you are attending from a distance, and there were too-sadly-typical zoom challenges. Also, addressing the problems of yesterday caused us to lose 1/2 hour of today’s session (~2 p.m.. to 2:31), so Actions were compressed in a way that was not quite fair to the AIW folks. Hopefully, a 1-timei situation but unfortunate for sure.